Torre de Babel Ediciones

Buscar

VOCABULARY OF PHILOSOPHY – ACTUAL

ACTUAL (quod est in actu) is opposed by Aristotle to potential. A rough stone is a statue potentially; when chiselled, actually.»The relation of the potential to the actual Aristotle exhibits by the relation of the raw material to the finished article; of the unemployed carpenter to the one at work upon his building; of the individual asleep to him awake. Potentially the seed is the tree, but the grown-up tree is it actually; a potential philosopher is the philosopher not philosophising; even before the battle the better general is the potential conqueror; in fact, everything is potential which possesses a principle of motion, of development, or of change; and which, if unhindered by anything external, will be of itself. Actuality or entelechy, on the other hand, indicates the perfect act, the end as gained, the completely actual (the grown-up tree, e.g., is the entelechy of the seed-corn), that activity in which the act and the completeness of the act fall together, e.g., to see, he thinks and he has thought, he sees and he has seen, are one and the same, while in these activities which involve a becoming, e.g., to learn, to go, to become well, the two (the act and its completion) are separated» (Schwegler, Hist, of Phil., Stirling, p. 108; cf. Lotze, Metaphysic, bk. I. sec. 41).— V. REAL.
 
© TORRE DE BABEL EDICIONES – Edition: Isabel Blanco  – Legal notice and privacy policy